On 29-03-13 18:03, Russ Allbery wrote: > Wouter Verhelst <w...@uter.be> writes: > >> I agree with this. This is why I proposed[1] a while back to look into >> clarifying which parts of policy really only apply to "packages uploaded >> to Debian", as opposed to "packages for local use", which may have >> different requirements in some cases. > >> There wasn't any response to that mail, however, which lead me to think >> there wasn't much interest in that proposal. > > For the record, I'm extremely interested in doing this, but it's a lot of > work and I have approximately zero time right now to work on Policy > things, so I can't (at the moment) help. I probably should have said all > of that instead of not saying anything; sorry!
No worries. I realize it's a lot of work, and I probably don't have enough time myself, either. I did want to bring it up, and I will want to help out if we ever decide to do this, but I definitely can't do it alone. > It strikes me as something that's best done as part of the long-delayed > larger restructuring that we've wanted to do when changing formats. Yes, I agree. -- Copyshops should do vouchers. So that next time some bureaucracy requires you to mail a form in triplicate, you can mail it just once, add a voucher, and save on postage. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5155d173.8090...@uter.be
