On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 08:59:39AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > I'm not sure we need that. There's an expectation that vacation messages > have a [vac] prefix in the subject, which is mostly followed (although > sometimes people do forget it). That makes it fairly easy to filter them > out for those who're not interested in them.
Yes, and even a simple filter (mine is currently [.*vac\s*] or similar) works 99% of the time. I like replies to VACs to go to my -private folder. I use a similar scheme for ITPs on -devel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130330163435.GA6722@debian