On 17/10/14 at 16:12 +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Hi, > > Lucas Nussbaum: > > For example, Ian's "software may not require a specific init system to be > > pid > > 1" could be abused by introducing a systemd-clone package in the archive > > Please try to ignore maleficial intent and similar failure modes. > > If we'd go that way, not only would we need to define (and capitalize) > every second word, but the GR proposals would be a lot longer – and > correspondingly harder to understand / apply correctly.
Oh, yes, sure. I'm just pointing out that the current proposals are quite long and complex (and yes, I'm guilty for that as well), and that it might be quite hard to understand what they mean in practice. When proposals will have stabilized, it could be useful to write an unofficial FAQ to explain what each option really means in practice. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141017151516.ga27...@xanadu.blop.info
