On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:46:19PM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le lundi, 20 octobre 2014, 14.14:58 Joey Hess a écrit :
> > The tech committe made a separate ruling on this question, and
> > decided:
> > > For the record, the TC expects maintainers to continue to
> > > support the multiple available init systems in Debian.  That
> > > includes merging reasonable contributions, and not reverting
> > > existing support without a compelling reason.
> > http://bugs.debian.org/746715
> 
> I didn't understand this as a technically binding ruling, rather as a 
> forewarning to maintainers, from the TC; this is underlined by the "the 
> TC expects" rather than explicitly using one of the TC powers (§6.1).
> 
> > So, your proposal actually overrules this decision of the tech
> > committee.
> 
> I don't see it that way; the developers' body would be exercising one TC 
> power without overriding a previous decision. Let's see what the 
> secretary@ (CC'ed) thinks...

Either it's a position statement, or we're making position
statement (4.1.5), or using the TC's power (4.1.4).

In #727708 it says that a position statement will replace
"this TC resolution".

In #746715 there is no such text.

So the question is going to be if this options overrides #746715
or not.  I didn't look into it yet, so I might be turning 1 or
more of the options into overrding the TC and put them under
4.1.4.


Kurt


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141020193329.ga5...@roeckx.be

Reply via email to