On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:46:19PM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le lundi, 20 octobre 2014, 14.14:58 Joey Hess a écrit : > > The tech committe made a separate ruling on this question, and > > decided: > > > For the record, the TC expects maintainers to continue to > > > support the multiple available init systems in Debian. That > > > includes merging reasonable contributions, and not reverting > > > existing support without a compelling reason. > > http://bugs.debian.org/746715 > > I didn't understand this as a technically binding ruling, rather as a > forewarning to maintainers, from the TC; this is underlined by the "the > TC expects" rather than explicitly using one of the TC powers (§6.1). > > > So, your proposal actually overrules this decision of the tech > > committee. > > I don't see it that way; the developers' body would be exercising one TC > power without overriding a previous decision. Let's see what the > secretary@ (CC'ed) thinks...
Either it's a position statement, or we're making position statement (4.1.5), or using the TC's power (4.1.4). In #727708 it says that a position statement will replace "this TC resolution". In #746715 there is no such text. So the question is going to be if this options overrides #746715 or not. I didn't look into it yet, so I might be turning 1 or more of the options into overrding the TC and put them under 4.1.4. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141020193329.ga5...@roeckx.be
