Hi, Charles Plessy: > I propose the following replacement as per article A.1.5 of our Contitution. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General > Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcome of > the vote. > > Regarding the subject of this ballot, the Project affirms that the procedures > for decision making and conflict resolution are working adequately and thus > a General Resolution is not required. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Seconded. While I disagree with the statement that > not all questions have been answered. the above re-wording is less controversial, which is a Good Thing (in this case, at least).
-- -- Matthias Urlichs
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
