Ian, Le mercredi, 22 octobre 2014, 13.34:27 Ian Jackson a écrit : > Jonas Smedegaard writes ("Re: Tentative summary of the amendments"): > > I too find it wrong to interpret Ian's text as a war between systemd > > and sysvinit - that's anything but "basically fine"! > > It's only a war between systemd and sysvinit insofar as some of > systemd's proponents are trying to abolish everything except systemd, > which encompasses abolishing sysvinit.
Can you _please_ point to such attempts or retract your unfounded FUD? As far as I have read so far, most "systemd's proponents" only want the software they maintain be _allowed_ to use the systemd features in a Debian context, something which is totally unrelated to "abolishing sysvinit". I'll go even further by pointing out that the systemd maintainers have pointed [0] their intend to _ensure_ that sysvinit would _stay_ at the users' disposal even through upgrades migrating to having systemd as pid1. I will also note that so far only Jonas and you have used the term "war" in the context of this GR discussion period. I thought the discussion period was supposed to be rather a democratic exercise than a call to arms. OdyX [0] https://lists.debian.org/<871tq1fihn....@xoog.err.no> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1564256.lJdt0hsHAp@gyllingar