On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 07:15:15PM +0000, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 08:58:49AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > > j...@joshtriplett.org:
> > > > Personally, I'd actually love to see a port of systemd (a *complete*
> > > > port of systemd) to be capable of running in system mode without being
> > > > PID 1.
> > > 
> > > Why would you need to port it?
> > > You can do that today quite easily; just say "systemd --system".
> > > 
> > > I have no idea what that does WRT cgroups management, and obviously it
> > > won't be able to cleanly shut down the system, but AFAIK everything else
> > > should work.
> > 
> > Well, *that's* useful; thanks!  I previously had the impression that
> > systemd did not support this at all.
> 
> > This seems like a sensible, sustainable, long-term solution for
> > supporting multiple init systems as PID 1, while still allowing services
> > to make use of systemd-specific functionality.  (Much like services
> > today could depend on runit.)  Thoughts?
> 
> This, sounds most interesing.  Has anyone actually tried this out?

Hi, responses unfortunately indicate that this doesn't work even nearly
as smoothly as advertised above.

Regards, Gerrit.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20141028101300.797.qm...@e55a6585c1c88e.315fe32.mid.smarden.org

Reply via email to