On 04/11/14 at 02:16 +0000, Sam Hartman wrote: > >>>>> "Don" == Don Armstrong <d...@debian.org> writes: > > >> Personally, I agree that having multiple active discussion/second > >> periods on debian-vote is problematic. > > Don> Right; that's what we seemed to agree on as well. > > Don> I think that we can all agree that we'd like a decision on this > Don> amendment significantly before January 1st, which presumably > Don> means having it formally proposed well before December 3rd. > > OK. So there is some time pressure.
Of course, it would be better if this GR could be passed before January 1st, 2015. However, we could avoid having to rush things by simply including a paragraph that says something such as: If this GR proposal is passed after 2015-01-01, then the first automatic review of membership of the Technical Committee happens immediately. With the current wording of a 4.5 years limit, this also doesn't change anything for the future unless we delay it so much that there's no time to appoint new members before 2015-07-01. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141104154230.ga22...@xanadu.blop.info
