On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 04:27:21AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote: > I'd assume he was referring to: > > > If my GR passes we will only have to have this conversation if those > > who are outvoted do not respect the project's collective decision. > > > If my GR fails I expect a series of bitter rearguard battles over > > individual systemd dependencies. > > This to me reads like the threat Holger mentioned. And for the record, I was > very surprised to this given the history of the decision.
FWIW, I did not read this as a threat, or at least, I did not read it as suggesting that Ian himself would participate in this bitter rearguard action. I read this as meaning Ian suspected that unless his GR was carried, various anti-systemd people would not be mollified and their disagreement would percolate down to individual packages and bugs, rather than being discussed (and potentially addressed) at a project-wide level. As such, and I'm assuming good faith on Ian's part here, I think Ian was trying to describe what he thought was the likely outcome, and not specifically threaten to behave in a particular way. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141109102640.gc29...@chew.redmars.org
