On Thu, Sep 8, 2016, at 16:15, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > so, as previously announced I hereby like to propose to hold another GR > to revert the decission of > https://www.debian.org/vote/2005/vote_002.en.html as the last 11 years > have shown, that noone is willing to do the work and that it would be > very difficult up to impractical or unethical, as too many people writing > on debian-private do no allow declassification of their contributions. > > Despite the results of https://www.debian.org/vote/2016/vote_002 I think > we should vote on three options: > > a.) we want to declassify debian-private@l.d.o > b.) we give up on this and revert > https://www.debian.org/vote/2005/vote_002.en.html > c.) further discussion. > > I don't think omitting option a.) is a good idea, even though we just > voted that we prefer c.) over a.) ;-) > > I'm hereby looking for people seconding this proposal so the secretary > can start the voting process properly.
Seconded. -- Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server Knot Resolver (https://www.knot-resolver.cz/) – secure, privacy-aware, fast DNS(SEC) resolver Vše pro chleba (https://vseprochleba.cz) – Potřeby pro pečení chleba všeho druhu > Last and least, *please* respect the reply-to: header and *do not* send > your reply to -private nor -project. (And I'm not subscribed to > debian-vote@ldo). If only Fastmail allowed that :(, argh.
