On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 08:43:06AM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote: > > >>>>> "Kurt" == Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> writes: > > > Kurt> I always struggle with trying to understand that part, but my > Kurt> current interpretation is different. The page shows the > Kurt> discussion perriod starting at the 19th, which is when Ian's > Kurt> proposal got enough sponsors. > > My understanding is that you believe any formal amendment achieving > sufficient sponsors restarts the discussion period. > You may also believe that a sponsor of a formal amendment accepting a > change to that amendment resets the discussion period. > I argue below that is inconsistent with the constitution and introduces > significant strategic problems.
I already changed my mind. Like I said, I always struggle with it. I'll try write something down of all the things I get confused about later. Kurt
