[2019-11-21 13:58] Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
> Sam Hartman writes ("Should I withdraw choice hartmans1?"):
> > By this point we have a group of people who have consistently seconded
> > options that promote init diversity.
> > That is, we have a group of people who have gotten behind specific
> > options.
> >
> > I'd like to ask especially those people whether choice hartmans1 should
> > be removed from the ballot. Within limits, I think more options is
> > better, so my general preference would be to keep the option. However
> > especially if that option is sene as a distraction by the init diversity
> > proponents, that could be a significant concern.
> >
> > At one point Dmitry expressed a preference for removing that option, but
> > I don't think I've gotten feedback from others who have seconded (or
> > proposed) the diversity options now on the ballot.
>
> I am putting Dmitry and his other seconders in the To field of this
> mail to draw their attention to this question.
[ I read version of hartman1, which is based on my draft with s/must/should/]
I do not think your option actually adds value, and not aware of
somebody, who prefers your option to either Ian's or mine. On other
hand our system is resistant to multiple close options, so the only loss
is that every voter will have to thorously read one more text.
I weakly favors your withdraw of hartman1.
--
Note, that I send and fetch email in batch, once in a few days.
Please, mention in body of your reply when you add or remove recepients.
