Hello, On Fri 29 Nov 2019 at 10:00PM -08, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Speaking as one of the Policy editors, personally I'd rather have the > explicit time frame so that we don't have to argue about what "enough > time" means. I like Ian's explicit list, which preempts a lot of the > expected arguments. Speaking as the other Policy Editor, I concur. Ian's proposal is a powerful compromise because of its preemption of certain points of disagreement. For similar reasons, I don't think that Guillem's new proposal is sufficient to answer the project's current needs. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
