Hi Ian, On Di 03 Dez 2019 13:54:40 CET, Ian Jackson wrote:
* Should I adopt Guillem's framing as a preamble to my own proposal ? (Should this be a new alternative or a replacement?) * Would Guillem's framing make a good preamble to Dmitry's option ? * Or do the supporters of Guillem's option favour some other combination of possible answers to the specific questions ?
Personally, I think that the full scope of the tendency spectrum regarding init systems is +/- covered by the available proposals.
However, not all proposals provide proper guidance how to act and react in certain corner and/or non-corner cases.
I think, this lack of specifics can be amended with a follow-GR that goes into details and fine-tunes the voted for proposal.
Personally, I am much more on the multiple init systems side than on the systemd side, however, if the majority in Debian wants to see systemd-only, you can safe the drafting time today for other valuable tasks.
My 2¢, light+love Mike -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM c\o Technik- und Ökologiezentrum Eckernförde Mike Gabriel, Marienthaler str. 17, 24340 Eckernförde mobile: +49 (1520) 1976 148 landline: +49 (4351) 850 8940 GnuPG Fingerprint: 9BFB AEE8 6C0A A5FF BF22 0782 9AF4 6B30 2577 1B31 mail: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de
pgpyIX_aSZYC3.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur
