On Friday, December 6, 2019 3:59:43 PM EST Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 09:04:39PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Ok, so here's what I'd like (or would have liked) to get into the ballot, > > given the new context after the addition of the combined D+G option. But > > it's not very clear to me whether this will be acceptable or not to the > > Secretary, and what would be the actual procedure to replace the existing > > option G with this one (as long as enough of the original sponsors are > > fine with it), as I've found the way the procedure was applied/interpreted > > to be rather confusing or perhaps not matching my memory of previous > > instances. > > You're really cutting this short, sending an email 4 hours before the > vote starts, and we're not at 3 hours before the start. I'm going to > need to see at least 5 people seconding this update before 23 UTC, > so 2 hours left, to allow this update.
I count there are 5 now. Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
