Sam Hartman wrote: > it clearly would be an abuse if some privileged category of people got to > choose the ballot options.
Hello Sam, I'm struggling to understand your concern here. Is it just an abstract concern or do you have in mind some specific scenario in which that could happen? As far as I can see, with respect to choosing ballot options, all DDs are equal except the DPL, who can propose options without the need for seconds, and the Secretary, who gets the final word on the ballot. So I'm failing to see how any category of people could grab a privilege on that. Could you please explain? And if that's an actual risk, do you think there's any measure that could be taken to prevent it? Gerardo