Russ Allbery dijo [Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 08:19:26AM -0800]: > > I was under the impression that this amendment by the original > > proposer does not require re-sponsoring, and my consent is > > implicitly assumed unless I choose to object. Am I wrong? > > > (If I am, consider this my sponsoring of the amended version) > > That's also my understanding; I don't think anyone else has to do anything > unless they object. (But of course Kurt's ruling is the one to follow.)
Ok... Well, your new text has at least three full-text seconders and one implicit seconder (who didn't full-quote it). It won't hurt if people sign it ;-)