On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 08:20:18PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> As previously discussed, and given that there has been no further
> discussion, I am calling for a vote on the general resolution on the
> Debian resolution process, using the ballot currently on the web site at
> https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_003 (last modified 2021-12-25). I
> believe the first option matches the text that I previously sent to the
> list and formally accepted, and the second option listed there matches the
> last text circulated by Wouter.
>
> I propose the following for the short ballot text:
>
> Choice 1: Amend resolution process, set maximum discussion period
> Choice 2: Amend resolution process, allow extension of discussion period
Here is the draft ballot:
Voting period starts 2022-01-15 00:00:00 UTC
Votes must be received by 2022-01-28 23:59:59 UTC
The following ballot is for voting on changing the resolution process.
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at https://www.debian.org/devel/constitution.
For voting questions or problems contact secret...@debian.org.
The details of the general resolution can be found at:
https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_003
Also, note that you can get a fresh ballot any time before the end of
the vote by sending a signed mail to
bal...@vote.debian.org
with the subject "gr_resolution_process".
To vote you need to be a Debian Developer.
HOW TO VOTE
To cast a vote, it is necessary to send this ballot filled out to a
dedicated e-mail address, in a signed message, as described below.
The dedicated email address this ballot should be sent to is:
gr_resolution_proc...@vote.debian.org
The form you need to fill out is contained below in this
message, marked with two lines containing the characters
'-=-=-=-=-=-'. Do not erase anything between those lines, and do not
change the choice names.
There are 3 choices in the form, which you may rank with numbers between
1 and 3. In the brackets next to your preferred choice, place a 1.
Place a 2 in the brackets next to your next choice. Continue until you
reach your last choice. Do not enter a number smaller than 1 or larger
than 3.
You may skip numbers, leave some choices unranked, and rank options
equally. Unranked choices are considered equally the least desired
choices, and ranked below all ranked choices.
To vote "no, no matter what", rank "Further Discussion" as more desirable
than the unacceptable choices, or you may rank the "Further Discussion"
choice and leave choices you consider unacceptable blank. (Note: if the
"Further Discussion" choice is unranked, then it is equal to all other
unranked choices, if any -- no special consideration is given to the
"Further Discussion" choice by the voting software).
Finally, mail the filled out ballot to: gr_resolution_proc...@vote.debian.org.
Don't worry about spacing of the columns or any quote characters (">")
that your reply inserts.
NOTE: The vote must be GPG signed (or PGP signed) with your key that is
in the Debian keyring. You may, if you wish, choose to send a signed,
encrypted ballot: use the vote key appended below for encryption.
The voting software (Devotee) accepts mail that either contains only an
unmangled OpenPGP message (RFC 2440 compliant), or a PGP/MIME mail
(RFC 3156 compliant). To avoid problems I suggest you use PGP/MIME.
VOTING SECRECY
This is a non-secret vote. After the voting period is over the details on
who voted what will be published. During the vote itself the only
information that will be published is who voted.
You can encrypt your message to the voting system to keep your vote secret
until the end of the voting period. The software will also try to keep
your vote secret and will encrypt the reply it sends to you.
VOTING FORM
- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
21916133-a790-4979-ab9c-d64222d36304
[ ] Choice 1: Amend resolution process, set maximum discussion period
[ ] Choice 2: Amend resolution process, allow extension of discussion period
[ ] Choice 3: Further Discussion
- - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
BALLOT OPTIONS
Choice 1: Amend resolution process, set maximum discussion period
=================================================================
Rationale
=========
We have uncovered several problems with the current constitutional
mechanism for preparing a Technical Committee resolution or General
Resolution for vote:
* The timing of calling for a vote is discretionary and could be used
strategically to cut off discussion while others were preparing
additional ballot options.
* The original proposer of a GR has special control over the timing of the
vote, which could be used strategically to the disadvantage of other
ballot options.
* The description of the process for adding and managing additional ballot
options is difficult to understand.
* The current default choice of "further discussion" for a General
Resolution has implications beyond rejecting the other options that may,
contrary to its intent, discourage people Developers ranking it above
options they wish to reject.
The actual or potential implications of these problems caused conflict in
the Technical Committee systemd vote and in GRs 2019-002 and 2021-002,
which made it harder for the project to reach a fair and widely-respected
result.
This constitutional change attempts to address those issues by
* separating the Technical Committee process from the General Resolution
process since they have different needs;
* requiring (passive) consensus among TC members that a resolution is
ready to proceed to a vote;
* setting a maximum discussion period for a TC resolution and then
triggering a vote;
* setting a maximum discussion period for a GR so that the timing of the
vote is predictable;
* extending the GR discussion period automatically if the ballot changes;
* modifying the GR process to treat all ballot options equally, with a
clearer process for addition, withdrawal, and amendment;
* changing the default option for a GR to "none of the above"; and
* clarifying the discretion extended to the Project Secretary.
It also corrects a technical flaw that left the outcome of the vote for
Technical Committee Chair undefined in the event of a tie, and clarifies
responsibilities should the Technical Committee put forward a General
Resolution under §4.2.1.
Effect of the General Resolution
================================
The Debian Developers, by way of General Resolution, amend the Debian
constitution under §4.1.2 as follows. This General Resolution
requires a 3:1 majority.
Section 4.2.1
-------------
Replace "amendment" with "ballot option."
Section 4.2.4
-------------
Strike the sentence "The minimum discussion period is 2 weeks, but may be
varied by up to 1 week by the Project Leader." (A modified version of
this provision is added to §A below.) Add to the end of this paragraph:
The default option is "None of the above."
Section 4.2.5
-------------
Replace "amendments" with "ballot options."
Section 5.1.5
-------------
Replace in its entirety with:
Propose General Resolutions and ballot options for General
Resolutions. When proposed by the Project Leader, sponsors for the
General Resolution or ballot option are not required; see §4.2.1.
Section 5.2.7
-------------
Replace "section §A.6" with "§A.5".
Section 6.1.7
-------------
Replace "section §A.6" with "§A.5".
Add to the end of this section:
There is no casting vote. If there are multiple options with no
defeats in the Schwartz set at the end of §A.5.8, the winner will
be randomly chosen from those options, via a mechanism chosen by the
Project Secretary.
Section 6.3
-----------
Replace 6.3.1 in its entirety with:
1. Resolution process.
The Technical Committee uses the following process to prepare a
resolution for vote:
1. Any member of the Technical Committee may propose a resolution.
This creates an initial two-option ballot, the other option
being the default option of "None of the above". The proposer
of the resolution becomes the proposer of the ballot option.
2. Any member of the Technical Committee may propose additional
ballot options or modify or withdraw a ballot option they
proposed.
3. If all ballot options except the default option are withdrawn,
the process is canceled.
4. Any member of the Technical Committee may call for a vote on the
ballot as it currently stands. This vote begins immediately, but
if any other member of the Technical Committee objects to
calling for a vote before the vote completes, the vote is
canceled and has no effect.
5. Two weeks after the original proposal the ballot is closed to
any changes and voting starts automatically. This vote cannot be
canceled.
6. If a vote is canceled under §6.3.1.4 later than 13 days after
the initial proposed resolution, the vote specified in §6.3.1.5
instead starts 24 hours after the time of cancellation. During
that 24 hour period, no one may call for a vote, but Technical
Committee members may make ballot changes under §6.3.1.2.
Add a new paragraph to the start of 6.3.2 following "Details regarding
voting":
Votes are decided by the vote counting mechanism described in
§A.5. The voting period lasts for one week or until the outcome is
no longer in doubt assuming no members change their votes,
whichever is shorter. Members may change their votes until the
voting period ends. There is a quorum of two. The Chair has a
casting vote. The default option is "None of the above".
Strike "The Chair has a casting vote." from the existing text and make the
remaining text a separate, second paragraph.
In 6.3.3, replace "amendments" with "ballot options."
Add, at the end of 6.3, the following new section:
7. Proposing a general resolution.
When the Technical Committee proposes a general resolution or a
ballot option in a general resolution to the project under §4.2.1,
it may delegate (via resolution or other means agreed on by the
Technical Committee) the authority to withdraw, amend, or make
minor changes to the ballot option to one of its members. If it
does not do so, these decisions must be made by resolution of the
Technical Committee.
Section A
---------
Replace §A.0 through §A.5 in their entirety with:
A.0. Proposal
1. The formal procedure begins when a draft resolution is proposed and
sponsored, as specified in §4.2.1.
2. This draft resolution becomes a ballot option in an initial
two-option ballot, the other option being the default option, and
the proposer of the draft resolution becomes the proposer of that
ballot option.
A.1. Discussion and amendment
1. The discussion period starts when a draft resolution is proposed
and sponsored. The minimum discussion period is 2 weeks. The
maximum discussion period is 3 weeks.
2. A new ballot option may be proposed and sponsored according to the
requirements for a new resolution.
3. The proposer of a ballot option may amend that option provided that
none of the sponsors of that ballot option at the time the
amendment is proposed disagree with that change within 24 hours. If
any of them do disagree, the ballot option is left unchanged.
4. The addition of a ballot option or the change via an amendment of a
ballot option changes the end of the discussion period to be one
week from when that action was done, unless that would make the
total discussion period shorter than the minimum discussion period
or longer than the maximum discussion period. In the latter case,
the length of the discussion period is instead set to the maximum
discussion period.
5. The proposer of a ballot option may make minor changes to that
option (for example, typographical fixes, corrections of
inconsistencies, or other changes which do not alter the meaning),
providing no Developer objects within 24 hours. In this case the
length of the discussion period is not changed. If a Developer does
object, the change must instead be made via amendment under §A.1.3.
6. The Project Leader may, at any point in the process, increase or
decrease the minimum and maximum discussion period by up to 1 week
from their original values in §A.1.1, except that they may not do
so in a way that causes the discussion period to end within 48
hours of when this change is made. The length of the discussion
period is then recalculated as if the new minimum and maximum
lengths had been in place during all previous ballot changes under
§A.1.1 and §A.1.4.
7. The default option has no proposer or sponsors, and cannot be
amended or withdrawn.
A.2. Withdrawing ballot options
1. The proposer of a ballot option may withdraw. If they do, new
proposers may come forward to keep the ballot option alive, in
which case the first person to do so becomes the new proposer and
any others become sponsors if they aren't sponsors already. Any new
proposer or sponsors must meet the requirements for proposing or
sponsoring a new resolution.
2. A sponsor of a ballot option may withdraw.
3. If the withdrawal of the proposer and/or sponsors means that a
ballot option has no proposer or not enough sponsors to meet the
requirements for a new resolution, and 24 hours pass without this
being remedied by another proposer and/or sponsors stepping
forward, it is removed from the draft ballot. This does not change
the length of the discussion period.
4. If all ballot options except the default option are withdrawn, the
resolution is canceled and will not be voted on.
A.3. Calling for a vote
1. After the discussion period has ended, the Project Secretary will
publish the ballot and call for a vote. The Project Secretary may
do this immediately following the end of the discussion period and
must do so within seven days of the end of the discussion period.
2. The Project Secretary determines the order of ballot options and
their summaries used for the ballot. The Project Secretary may ask
the ballot option proposers to draft those summaries, and may
revise them for clarity at their discretion.
3. Minor changes to ballot options under §A.1.5 may only be made if at
least 24 hours remain in the discussion period, or if the Project
Secretary agrees the change does not alter the meaning of the
ballot option and (if it would do so) warrants delaying the
vote. The Project Secretary will allow 24 hours for objections
after any such change before issuing the call for a vote.
4. No new ballot options may be proposed, no ballot options may be
amended, and no proposers or sponsors may withdraw if less than 24
hours remain in the discussion period, unless this action
successfully extends the discussion period under §A.1.4 by at least
24 additional hours.
5. Actions to preserve the existing ballot may be taken within the
last 24 hours of the discussion period, namely a sponsor objecting
to an amendment under §A.1.3, a Developer objecting to a minor
change under §A.1.5, stepping forward as the proposer for an
existing ballot option whose original proposer has withdrawn it
under §A.2.1, or sponsoring an existing ballot option that has
fewer than the required number of sponsors because of the
withdrawal of a sponsor under §A.2.2.
6. The Project Secretary may make an exception to §A.3.4 and accept
changes to the ballot after they are no longer allowed, provided
that this is done at least 24 hours prior to the issuance of a call
for a vote. All other requirements for making a change to the
ballot must still be met. This is expected to be rare and should
only be done if the Project Secretary believes it would be harmful
to the best interests of the project for the change to not be made.
A.4. Voting procedure
1. Options which do not have an explicit supermajority requirement
have a 1:1 majority requirement. The default option does not have
any supermajority requirements.
2. The votes are counted according to the rules in §A.5.
3. In cases of doubt the Project Secretary shall decide on matters of
procedure.
Rename §A.6 to §A.5.
Replace the paragraph at the end of §A.6 (now §A.5) with:
When the vote counting mechanism of the Standard Resolution Procedure
is to be used, the text which refers to it must specify who has a
casting vote, the quorum, the default option, and any supermajority
requirement. The default option must not have any supermajority
requirements.
Choice 2: Amend resolution process, allow extension of discussion period
Rationale
=========
Much of the rationale of Russ' proposal still applies, and indeed this
amendment builds on it. However, the way the timing works is different,
on purpose.
Our voting system, which neither proposal modifies, as a condorcet
voting mechanism, does not suffer directly from too many options on the
ballot. While it is desirable to make sure the number of options on the
ballot is not extremely high for reasons of practicality and voter
fatigue, it is nonetheless of crucial importance that all the *relevant*
options are represented on the ballot, so that the vote outcome is not
questioned for the mere fact that a particular option was not
represented on the ballot. Making this possible requires that there is
sufficient time to discuss all relevant opinions.
Russ' proposal introduces a hard limit of 3 weeks to any and all ballot
processes, assuming that that will almost always be enough, and relying
on withdrawing and restarting the voting process in extreme cases where
it turns out more time is needed; in Russ' proposal, doing so would
increase the discussion time by another two weeks at least (or one if
the DPL reduces the discussion time).
In controversial votes, I believe it is least likely for all ballot
proposers to be willing to use this escape hatch of withdrawing the vote
and restarting the process; and at the same time, controversial votes
are the most likely to need a lot of discussion to build a correct
ballot, which implies they would be most likely to need some extra time
-- though not necessarily two more weeks -- for the ballot to be
complete.
At the same time, I am not insensitive to arguments of predictability,
diminishing returns, and process abuse which seem to be the main
arguments in favour of a hard time limit at three weeks.
For this reason, my proposal does not introduce a hard limit, and
*always* makes it theoretically possible to increase the discussion
time, but does so in a way that extending the discussion time becomes
harder and harder as time goes on. I believe it is better for the
constitution to allow a group of people to have a short amount of extra
time so they can finish their proposed ballot option, than to require
the full discussion period to be restarted through the withdrawal and
restart escape hatch. At the same time, this escape hatch is not
removed, although I expect it to be less likely to be used.
The proposed mechanism sets the initial discussion time to 1 week, but
allows it to be extended reasonably easily to 2 or 3 weeks, makes it
somewhat harder to reach 4 weeks, and makes it highly unlikely (but
still possible) to go beyond that.
Text of the GR
==============
The Debian Developers, by way of General Resolution, amend the Debian
constitution under point 4.1.2 as follows. This General Resolution
requires a 3:1 majority.
Sections 4 through 7
--------------------
Copy from Russ' proposal, replacing cross-references to §A.5 by §A.6,
where relevant.
Section A
---------
Replace section A as per Russ' proposal, with the following changes:
A.1.1. Replace the sentence "The minimum discussion period is 2 weeks."
by "The initial discussion period is 1 week." Strike the sentence
"The maximum discussion period is 3 weeks".
A.1.4. Strike in its entirety
A.1.5. Rename to A.1.4, and strike the sentence "In this case the length
of the discussion period is not changed".
A.1.6. Strike in its entirety
A.1.7. Rename to A.1.5.
After A.2, insert:
A.3. Extending the discussion time.
1. When less than 48 hours remain in the discussion time, any Developer
may propose an extension to the discussion time, subject to the
limitations of §A.3.3. These extensions may be sponsored according to
the same rules that apply to new ballot options.
2. As soon as a time extension has received the required number of
sponsors, these sponsorships are locked in and cannot be withdrawn,
and the time extension is active.
3. When a time extension has received the required number of sponsors,
its proposers and sponsors may no longer propose or sponsor any
further time extension for the same ballot, and any further sponsors
for the same extension proposal will be ignored for the purpose of
this paragraph. In case of doubt, the Project Secretary decides how
the order of sponsorships is determined.
4. The first two successful time extensions will extend the discussion
time by one week; any further time extensions will extend the
discussion time by 72 hours.
5. Once the discussion time is longer than 4 weeks, any Developer may
object to further time extensions. Developers who have previously
proposed or sponsored a time extension may object as well. If the
number of objections outnumber the proposer and their sponsors,
including sponsors who will be ignored as per §A.3.3, the time
extension will not be active and the discussion time does not change.
6. Once the discussion time expires, any pending time extension
proposals that have not yet received their required number of
sponsors are null and void, and no further time extensions may be
proposed.
A.3. Rename to A.4.
A.3.6 (now A.4.6): replace 'A.3.4' by 'A.4.4'.
A.4. Rename to A.5.
A.4.2 (now A.5.2): replace '§A.5' by '§A.6'.
A.5. Rename (back) to A.6.
Choice 3: Further Discussion
============================
This is the default option. Rank this option higher than the unacceptable
choices.
VOTE RESULTS
The responses to a valid vote shall be signed by the vote key created
for this vote. The public key for the vote, signed by the Project
secretary, is appended below.
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----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=xrGI
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
