-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi,
I like this option. Let's place it on the ballot. Thanks! Kind regards, Felix Lechner On Wednesday, February 23, 2022 5:44:34 PM EST Judit Foglszinger wrote: > I propose a ballot option for the GR > "Hide Identities of Developers Casting a Particular Vote" > that makes the following changes to the constitution. > > 1) Do not make the identity of a voter casting a particular vote public. > > 6) Codify that our election system must permit independent verification > of the outcome given the votes cast and must permit developers to > confirm their vote is included in the votes cast. > > So it's the proposed GR minus the changes > not directly related to introducing secret votes. > > I ask for seconds aka sponsors for this Option. > > Rationale > ========= > > Give the opportunity to vote for secret voting without needing to > additionally vote for unrelated/only slightly related > constitution changes; > for example for the change of mode of voting > from email to something not defined. > > As it was mentioned in the discussion, > there might be no consensus on which options are direcly related - > This option regards the need to allow verification (6)) > as directly related to secret votes, because otherwise > they would become completely unverifiable. > > Summary of Changes > ================== > > 1) Do not make the identity of a voter casting a particular vote > public. > > 6) Codify that our election system must permit independent verification > of the outcome given the votes cast and must permit developers to > confirm their vote is included in the votes cast. > > > <h3>4.2. Procedure</h3> > @@ -228,9 +246,10 @@ earlier can overrule everyone listed later.</cite></p> > <p> > Votes are taken by the Project Secretary. Votes, tallies, and > results are not revealed during the voting period; after the > vote the Project Secretary lists all the votes {+cast in sufficient > detail that anyone may verify the outcome of the election from the votes > cast. The+} {+ identity of a developer casting a particular vote is > not made+} {+ public, but developers will be given an option to > confirm their vote is included in the votes+} cast. > > @@ -371,8 +390,7 @@ earlier can overrule everyone listed later.</cite></p> > necessary.</li> > > <li>The next two weeks are the polling period during which > Developers may cast their votes. [-Votes in leadership elections are-] > [- kept secret, even after the election is finished.</li>-]{+</li>+} -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKvBAEBCgCZFiEE8E0cIgLi+g0BiFTarFipTxFhjuAFAmIW5FZfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEYw NEQxQzIyMDJFMkZBMEQwMTg4NTREQUFDNThBOTRGMTE2MThFRTAbHGZlbGl4Lmxl Y2huZXJAbGVhc2UtdXAuY29tAAoJEKxYqU8RYY7gACcP/3CqHK7dvxyWrhofgDij 8M5oPJG8QfrQrZXP1d4OSCw27I+AjZZkCQvIULiz1TNfGyv9zh3+ozRAwsdR3s56 LszaUWrTjEYe4xjjLr5Y76yA1eVo06OwKRvT8iam2umbbRvlRmJdryhG03EowWPT Z46rmwTtFIB38YJQ1iiSU//hvuwVzCTPJBndSiVR9D4KrVwMJHarHbATtGatiR3/ h/cl4nKEl2h8WZ/QJngxdbLYrf0bFeDEAfsA9YMCebRFwPHNC9kMM/O9lNYlbLZb DXnWDVsA6olGp4obmXzor8ULRYEkiBKadDL6qJtIP5445HOBQuUDUwnV55uwO1Pz 5WmoYj/DGPiaZ+OGN3gQLo1TwfhdrMgIXH1qLsWF+qyV7hcht7w0dZN6E5AApUqh sgUsvNtM5LeI3VcZfVJvq6jgh9yd/8RZFUpiZ3ph/ngwuPCZQSTvDow9zvM/cZau nMa9BbDzIqySA9Jrmc/T4VfhpoIaQqq7MXuloeDsfvNItZRVuKwRJ2sq+1VVpfvV lXRCNd0PpS1Hf9H0Rwu/sWXriIAwFgNlnclosUHPphAxPwOi9i3zgaKKxCXLhABe ye4Yrdj+LzwONwEmyJqfmtlAYF9XIuJ0MWVMAuMASjdj05a21AfOfBdFk1Z9QbcB FLZKhJ/MHEZo1r1BBocSAxt9 =Tq8c -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----