On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 04:17:49PM -0400, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote: > I'm glad to see that secret votes as we have now didn't seem to encourage > 'opinions about non-technical issues outside the social contract'. So far, > such > GR proposal reached zero support,
Debatable, as the archive show. > possibly an indication that we didn't need to > keep publishing individual votes in order to collectively keep common sense. > Thus, > although I agree with your concerns, I keep believing that a correlation > between vote secrecy and arbitrary GRs is currently absent in our project. Sorry, I did not mean to imply correlation in this way. However the 2021_002 GR was a trigger for the secret vote GR proposal, and we should be better addressing the root cause than the effect. In any case, I am glad you agree with my concerns. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here.
