On Fri, 2022-04-08 at 10:44 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 08:21:39PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > If a Debconf location is also considered a political statement as > > you > > imply then we have to choose Debconf locations by means of GR, > > starting > > with a GR right now whether Debian wants to consider Kosovo a > > self-determined sovereign nation by holding Debconf 2022 there. > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but Debconf is not formally a part of > Debian, and so cannot be bound by the outcome of a GR anyway.
Hmm, debconf.org says "Copyright Software in the Public Interest, Inc", but there is no imprint or anything. DebConf as such is not listed as a separate project on https://www.spi-inc.org/projects/; of course it could still be part of systemd or another project. DebConf is also not listed on https://www.debian.org/trademark#licenses, but uses Debian trademarks. So it pretty much looks like DebConf is part of Debian. Ansgar