On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 09:04:37AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > We probably do need to say something about how you need to review the > licenses for non-free software before using or distributing it. This is > true for users as well. > > How about: > > We encourage careful review of the licensing of these packages before > use or redistribution, since the guarantees of the Debian Free > Software Guidelines do not apply to them.
You've gone back to specifics again with "use or redistribution" and I really don't think a third mention of our standards/DFSG in the same paragraph/heading will make any difference. I now think that any further wording should make some novel, specific, important point about the relationship between Debian and its users: On 2022/09/09 18:37, Bdale Garbee wrote: > We should work REALLY hard to have the SC capture the commitments we're > making to our users, and then stop.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
