On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 05:18:21PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> writes: > > > I welcome suggestion for the ballot texts. > > Tentative proposal, and the proponents of other options should jump in and > correct these. > > A: "Only one installer, including non-free firmware" > B: "Recommend installer containing non-free firmware" > C: "Provide installers with and without non-free firmware" > D: "Installer with non-free firmware not part of Debian" > E: "Change SC for non-free firmware in installer, one installer" > F: "Change SC for non-free firmware in installer, keep both installers" > > It's tricky to word the last two sufficiently succinctly to keep them on > one line without making them too cryptic. Any better suggestions very > much welcome.
The website should be updated, I'm preparing the ballot. It seems that the constitution on https://www.debian.org/devel/constitution has not been updated after https://www.debian.org/vote/2022/vote_001 It's my understanding that all votes are now secret votes like in the cae of a DPL election. Kurt