On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 12:14, Simon Richter <s...@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/15/23 15:22, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> >> The Debian project however notes that not enough emphasis has been
> >> employed in all parts of these regulations to clearly exonerate
> Free
> >> and Open Source Software Projects from being subject to the same
> >> liabilities as commercial products
>
> > I find this part a bit ambiguous. When GitLab or Proxmox or RedHat sells
> > services around a free software product, I think it's OK if they are
> > covered by this regulation. Maybe it would be better with
> > s/Projects/Organizations/?
>
> That is exactly why I think this is dangerous: I want GitLab and Proxmox
> to be responsible for what they release, but it is very difficult to
> draw a line between their offering and what Microsoft is doing by paying
> for systemd development while they are also selling Azure cloud.
>
Why should there be a borderline between that? Microsoft has to be
responsible
for what they are selling in the Azure cloud (pre-defined images),
regardless of
the systemd developer work.
--
Best regards,
Aigars Mahinovs
