Le Tue, May 06, 2025 at 01:26:19AM +0200, Aigars Mahinovs a écrit : > This one is much simpler. Maybe because the lawyers being used are not too > good. > > https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67538258/tremblay-v-openai-inc/ > > Authors claim a lot of stuff, basically a generic shotgun of copyright > claims, but all secondary claims get dismissed by the court at pre-trial > stage due to bad legal reasoning and failing to detail or prove any actual > wrongdoing. And specifically a claim that all outputs from a LLM are > derived works of all inputs is dismissed based on already decided case law. > > Only the claim of direct copyright infringement of using a text of a book > in the training process of a model still stands to avait the actual trial. > And there OpenAI is citing a lot of good reasons why that does not > constitute distribution at all and why the result of the work is > transformative and thus is protected by fair use. Just the fact of > accessing some data at some point does not create copyright infringement. > The whole lawsuit is very sloppy IMHO, IANAL.
If you want to know how the case is going, look at the second link I provided (this is the same case). Cheers, Bill.
