@Debian Project Secretary Please consider the proposal as submitted and signed to be the official proposal. The "Draft" part of the subject was in error. And the subject is not actually GPG signed anyway :)
On Wed, 7 May 2025 at 15:53, Sam Hartman <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>> "Aigars" == Aigars Mahinovs <[email protected]> writes: > > Aigars> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 > > Aigars> ** Proposal Text ** > > Aigars> Choice 3: Training data for training of AI models is not to > Aigars> be considered "source code" in the context of DFSG. Instead > Aigars> the real source code in such a case is "Training Data > Aigars> Information" and the training data itself is an intermediate > Aigars> build artifact. > > Aigars> AI models are compatible with DFSG only if they provide > Aigars> complete "Training Data Information". AI models whose > Aigars> reproduction from training data or from training data > Aigars> information is prohibitively expensive or is impractical are > Aigars> compatible with DFSG only if they provide ways to modify the > Aigars> AI model and create derivative works directly from the > Aigars> trained model. > > Aigars> The meaning of "Data Information" is based on definitions > Aigars> and explanations from > Aigars> https://opensource.org/ai/open-source-ai-definition > > Seconded/sponsored. > I think we're tight enough into the end of discussion period deadline > that you should make this a formal proposal immediately and I am happy > for my sponsorship to apply as soon as that happens. -- Best regards, Aigars Mahinovs mailto:[email protected] #--------------------------------------------------------------# | .''`. Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org) | | : :' : Latvian Open Source Assoc. (http://www.laka.lv) | | `. `' Software Engineer, BMW | | `- | #--------------------------------------------------------------#
