"M. Zhou" <[email protected]> writes: > I decided to withdraw the proposal A: "AI models released under > DFSG-compatible license without original training data or program" are > not seen as DFSG-compliant.
> Based on the overall discussions and feedbacks, we as a community is > underprepared to vote on this. Even if we vote, it is leading to a less > convincing result. According to the constitution, I think it is > completely fine to withdraw the proposal and cancel it temporarily, and > get back when we are ready for it. Thank you for all your work on this, and please don't consider this any sort of fault on your part. This happens a lot; people don't really engage until a GR is actually proposed, and even with the best of preparations, sometimes that surfaces a bunch of opinions that didn't show up before then. I think this is the right decision and I also hope it doesn't discourage you from continuing to work on this. I don't think anyone is saying that we shouldn't have this conversation and a vote, only that we (myself very much included) are realizing that we hadn't actually thought this through as thoroughly as we had thought. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
