On 16/03/26 13:23, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,

thank you for running for DPL. I appreciate the time and effort it takes
to step forward for this role, and I found your focus on diversity and
encouraging new contributors particularly interesting.

I'd like to start with a question related to that topic.

Occasionally contributors submit bug reports that already contain a
patch intended to fix or improve something. Sometimes such reports
remain unanswered for many years, or the attached patch is rejected with
only a brief explanation. While maintainers clearly have the final say
over their packages and limited time, situations like this can be
discouraging for contributors who have already invested effort into
preparing a patch.

In one recent case I looked at, a bug with an attached patch from 2014
only received its first response more than a decade later.

How do you think Debian should balance maintainer autonomy with a
welcoming culture for contributors?

I agree that there should be a balance between the maintainer autonomy and welcoming new contributors, not just with respect to this specific patch submission issue. I myself have come across cases where while we say we welcome new contributions, many of our actions give negative message to the newbies. I do not have a solution right now, but this is in fact one of the points I would like to bring it up for discussions during my tenure.

Do you see a role for project
leadership in encouraging practices such as acknowledging patches,
giving constructive explanations, or setting expectations about how
contributions should be handled?
I would be interested in your thoughts on how Debian can remain open to
contributions while respecting the realities of volunteer maintenance.

I believe that the solution should not come from the leadership, but from the community - leadership can facilitate the discussions.

Having said that , where the packages are maintained by an active team, I have personally found things working smoothly with existing and new contributors.


Kind regards
     Andreas.

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to