On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 12:31:59PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: > On Thursday, August 13, 2026 3:16:53 AM Mountain Standard Time David Prévot > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > If we add an option to discuss more on the subject, we probably should > > be able to express that we don’t want that either. > > > > I propose a new ballot option with the following title and content. > > > > Title: No Further Discussion > > > > Full text: No Further Discussion > > You could create that option, but I do not know how it could be enforced > without modifying the constitution (it would require a lot more text than you > have above). As the constitution currently stands, there is nothing a GR can > do that can prevent a future GR on the same subject.
I think this is meant to serve as an indication that we are tired discussing this subject and discussing this further will not lead to any outcome. But I agree with you: this is not a useful option at all and we already have ETOOMANYOPTIONS. We will have to make a decision at some point in time. Merely saying we will not discuss this further is going to neither halt another GR, nor make us not decide on this topic forever. Best, Nilesh
