On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 04:55:48PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > On 26.08.26 14:23, Lionel Élie Mamane wrote: > > gpg: WARNING: unsafe permissions on homedir > > '/srv/vote.debian.org/data/gr_llm' > > gpg: packet(2) with unknown version 5 > > gpg: no signature found > > gpg: the signature could not be verified. > > [GNUPG:] NODATA 3[GNUPG:] NODATA 4 > Bah. Don't we all hate the gnupg-vs-sq protocol version split …
The schism is over: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/B7ytSFXTVW84UfFd4cCW-DXhpAA/ and https://github.com/gpg/gnupg/commits/wk/rfc9980/ > I wonder what would be involved in teaching sq to at least verify gnupg's v5 > packets. Seems like an ideal task for an AI [SCNR]. casualy promoting the result of intellectual robbery, how nice of you. [SCNR] -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ Es ist das laute Nein, hinter dem Ausrufezeichen stehen.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
