> > The -stable suffix was added for the Debian alternatives system. While > I don't expect an issue with adding an /usr/lib/wine/wine64-stable > link, I wonder if the whole issue is really a bug (still probably a > regression, which I can't comment on since I'm not involved in current > packaging) or wrong usage.
Somehow /usr/bin/wine-stable has correct files in the right place, so /usr/bin/wine-stable works /usr/bin/wine64-stable fails because of missing files. Should /usr/bin/wine64-stable be there at all?