retitle 297437 RM: pdp11-unix-v5 -- orphaned, non-free, virtually unused
retitle 297438 RM: pdp11-unix-v6 -- orphaned, non-free, virtually unused
retitle 297440 RM: pdp11-unix-v7 -- orphaned, non-free, virtually unused
reassign 297437 ftp.debian.org
reassign 297438 ftp.debian.org
reassign 297440 ftp.debian.org
thanks

As stated, Kevin recently orphaned these non-free packages.

Additionally, popcon shows almost no use, a query on d-devel brought exactly 
zero responses, a query on IRC brought a 'go for it' (not that this says 
much).

On Wednesday 16 March 2005 14.37, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 02:33:06PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:

> > So I close this (298030) bug and retitle/reassign the wnpp ones now? 
> > Wait any longer?
>
> d-d isn't usefully archived (that is, per issue), like a buglog is, for
> later review by QA and afterwards FTP-team.
>
> Yeah, retitle & reassign the wnpp would be best, supplying a reason.

Ok, I hope this does what I want the way you (QA) want it.  

The delay was: because snapshots.d.n doesn't archive non-free, I sent the 
question about removals additionally to all people who previously 
maintained the packages or filed bugs against it (4 people or so). 2 of the 
email addresses bounced, the others didn't react in the last 10 days.


greetings
-- vbi

-- 
Die Zukunft kann man am besten voraussagen, indem man sie selbst
gestaltet.
  -- Alan Kay

Attachment: pgprniFCVDSXS.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to