Hi, Andreas Tille wrote: > I have seen that Nelson A. de Oliveira builded a package of pngquant. > Because Nelson recently became famous here for biological programs > I guess this program has some relevance for our project. Nelson, could > you confirm this and tell me, whether med-imaging should Depend, Recommend > or Suggest this?
Just one small description (that I will add on a next release of pngquant, when necessary) is this (or at least more or less like this): Optimizers (like pngcrush) optimize the compression, usually losslessly. pngquant quantizes colors down to 256 (or fewer) distinct RGBA combinations, which is quite lossy. They're very different applications. It's good to specify the difference between this PNG optimizer and other optimizers available. It can makes new PNG files 2 or 3 times smaller than the original. The resulting image is very good. In some cases there are apparently no visual difference between the original file and the new one. Since PNG is getting very used (I see a lot of programs having the default output as PNG and not GIF, JPG, TIFF, etc), could be very useful having a program to makes some PNG file smaller. pngcrunsh and pngquant, IMHO, should be included on med-imaging. If not on Depends, at least on Recommends. > Sponsoring would be no problem in this case because I have also a small > private interest in this package. pngquant is already on NEW queue (itīs more than 1 month there). Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has sponsored this upload to me. One thing that I don't know is why some packages take so long time to be processed. Some programs stay only 1 day on NEW queue, while others stay months there... Cheers Nelson