On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Colin Watson wrote: > I've been looking through packages that are in need of /usr/doc and > /usr/man updates and that would benefit from Debian QA uploads, and > dstooltk/dstooltk-doc were two of them. You said two months ago that you > were intending to adopt dstooltk{,-doc} - is this still the case?
Yes, that's still the case. Basically I have a dstooltk deb ready, but it still needs a bit of tinkering. The idea is now to get it similar to octave, i.e. dstooltk, dstooltk-headers, dstooltk-static and dstooltk-doc, since a very useful capibility from dstool is to link in user supplied code and this was missing in John Lapeyre's package. The source can all go into the same package pool. I could do dstooltk-doc quite quickly. > Do you need a sponsor for this package? Yes I do. I'll have everything ready in a couple of days - at least before next Sunday. But I have not applied to the new maintainer scheme yet, I'll have to look at that, getting a signed GNUPG key and things like that. Bart