On 31-Mar-2001 Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Andy Mortimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010315 20:42]: >> > How about removing it now? >> >> Why? This way, at least it gives people a chance to object! If you >> can think of a good reason to do so, feel free to pass it on. > > The package has a Standards-Version of 2.4.0 which in itself would be > a serious bug. Also, there are a couple of lintian errors: > > E: dpkg-mountable: cron-script-not-marked-as-conffile > etc/cron.weekly/dpkg-mountable > E: dpkg-mountable: binary-without-manpage updated-packages > E: dpkg-mountable: copyright-refers-to-old-directory > W: dpkg-mountable: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
All easy to fix, IMO. The first 3 errors at least, seem kinda easy to fix.
Perhaps the 4th is too, I just never ran into it before.
--
Carlos Laviola - ICQ 55799523
pub 1024D/3516D372 2000-06-05 Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key fingerprint = 3BE1 6591 C78C 2AA4 31DD AEEF 6406 0227 3516 D372
I have a solar vocal ail!
pgpyvRDb5YDdT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
