On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 01:54:39AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > I thought it was removed from Debian because it had so many security > > flaws. > > AFAIR it was removed at the end of the potato freeze because it had a > known security hole with a known fix but upstream didn't release a new > version and the old copyright did forbit the distribution of modified > binaries. The new licence as quoted in the last mail doesn't seem to have > this problem (although I think it doesn't comply to the DFSG because it's > a licence in the style of the old BSD licence _with_ the advertising > clause).
Which clause of the DFSG prohibits that? ------------------------------------------- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------------------------------- See also: http://tinc.nl.linux.org/ http://www.kernelbench.org/ -------------------------------------------
pgpSzMhFWNvD6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
