Your message dated Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:55:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#100225: fixed in gfcc 0.7.4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jun 2001 13:48:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 09 08:48:21 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pop.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [::ffff:194.221.183.20] 
        by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 158j6D-0000FS-00; Sat, 09 Jun 2001 08:48:21 -0500
Received: (qmail 4846 invoked by uid 0); 9 Jun 2001 13:48:20 -0000
Received: from pd9025bee.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO localhost.localdomain) 
(217.2.91.238)
  by mail.gmx.net (mail01) with SMTP; 9 Jun 2001 13:48:20 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Dr. Guenter Bechly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 14:56:20 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: O: gfcc
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 100225-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2001 19:21:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 14:21:59 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [::ffff:206.246.226.45] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 159XGA-0001QY-00; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:21:58 -0500
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 159Wq6-0006uB-00; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:55:02 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeremy T. Bouse)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.43 $
Subject: Bug#100225: fixed in gfcc 0.7.4-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:55:02 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gfcc, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gfcc_0.7.4-3.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gfcc/gfcc_0.7.4-3.dsc
gfcc_0.7.4-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gfcc/gfcc_0.7.4-3_i386.deb
gfcc_0.7.4-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gfcc/gfcc_0.7.4-3.diff.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jeremy T. Bouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gfcc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:11:06 -0700
Source: gfcc
Binary: gfcc
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7.4-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jeremy T. Bouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Jeremy T. Bouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 gfcc       - GTK firewall control center
Closes: 100225
Changes: 
 gfcc (0.7.4-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Adopted by new maintainer (closes: #100225)
   * Added linitan overrides for rules begining with #!ip-firewall
Files: 
 2313387326cb233d95511983d4b9e8a9 665 net optional gfcc_0.7.4-3.dsc
 b9e7ad5b763ae94bbaed0355b78608f9 9620 net optional gfcc_0.7.4-3.diff.gz
 7d5b5b1a3a59131963109fcd0c02d77c 45416 net optional gfcc_0.7.4-3_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7JPw4IcJXVD3J+UYRAiw/AJ0WWargtpW+dUQj5qaF2nH+zxk0LgCgmahV
M6FBPVDIOXa5xkqYI2D8tEA=
=H6iI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to