Your message dated Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:34:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Work-needing packages report for Aug 17, 2001
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jun 2001 13:48:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 09 08:48:15 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pop.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [::ffff:194.221.183.20]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 158j67-0000Eg-00; Sat, 09 Jun 2001 08:48:15 -0500
Received: (qmail 4708 invoked by uid 0); 9 Jun 2001 13:48:14 -0000
Received: from pd9025bee.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO localhost.localdomain)
(217.2.91.238)
by mail.gmx.net (mail01) with SMTP; 9 Jun 2001 13:48:14 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Dr. Guenter Bechly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 14:55:02 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: O: debian-graphics-nonfree
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 100218-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2001 16:35:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 17 11:35:01 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ifi.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de [129.69.211.1]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15XmaK-0008Ep-00; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 11:35:00 -0500
Received: from wwwvis.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
[129.69.215.162]) by ifi.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de (8.9.3/2.2) with ESMTP id
SAA07307; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:34:55 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from techno.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
[129.69.218.24]) by wwwvis.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de (8.9.3/2.2) with SMTP id
SAA27154; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:34:58 +0200
Received: by techno.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:34:57 +0200
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:34:57 +0200
From: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Work-needing packages report for Aug 17, 2001
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i
X-Operating-System: Linux techno 2.4.6
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Joshua Haberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > The following packages are orphaned:
> >
> > debian-graphics (#100217), orphaned 68 days ago
> >
> > debian-graphics-nonfree (#100218), orphaned 68 days ago
>
> These packages don't exist.
They were uploaded but never installed in the archive or something like
that, but yes, there's nothing to adopt.
Thanks,
--
Marcelo
