Hi ... On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 05:41:28PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: >* Jan-Hendrik Palic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20011101 15:19]: >> > I think you should do an ITA aswell... to make sure no-one else is >> > doing the same? >> Can you file a wnpp-bug for these packages relating to gtranscript, >> so I can retitle the bugreports to ITA? >Michel doesn't have time to fix his packages and now you want him to >post useless wnpp bugs?
Well, I wanted to file a ITA withy reportbug wnpp, but i wasn't
possible, so I asked a debian-developper and I answered, the usual way
is, first RFA, than a retiitle to ITA.
But I will do so, file a wnpp bug, ITA's for these packages.
Regards
Jan
--
One time, you all will be emulated by linux!
----
Jan- Hendrik Palic
Url:"http://www.billgotchy.de";
E-Mail: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s: a-- C++ UL++ P+++ L+++ E W++ N+ o+ K- w---
O- M- V- PS++ PE Y+ PGP++ t--- 5- X+++ R-- tv- b++ DI-- D+++
G+++ e+++ h+ r++ z+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
pgpen4Fx5T5JM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
