On Mar 19, 2010, at 12:11 PM, David Paleino wrote: please keep the bug CCed, so we can publicly keep history of the ITP. > > On Friday 19 March 2010 12:03:37, Jeremiah Foster wrote: >> On Mar 19, 2010, at 11:57 AM, David Paleino wrote:
> I do not see a real problem about depending on missing modules -- we > just need them packaged. > Here's my plan: I'm going to check what packages are exactly need to > build/run > asciio, and file RFPs. That's because I don't really want to maintain Perl > modules just because they happen to be dependencies to a package I want to > maintain. In case those RFPs aren't picked up by the Debian Perl Team, I'm > available to make them ITPs, and maintain them "pro tempore". > > From a quick analysis, I see that it's "only" missing 3 dependencies: > > - Eval::Context > - Data::TreeDumper::Renderer::GTK > - Directory::Scratch::Structured > > Sure, these might need other modules to work, and that's why the "blocking" > mechanism exists. We just need to climb up the dependency chain until it's > satisfied. > >> Let me know what you want me to do to help - I think there are still a >> bunch of dependencies. If you want we can split them up and I'll try to >> keep up with you? > > What exactly needs to be split up from the code? I was only referring to splitting up the work of packaging modules from CPAN. I don't believe the code needs any splitting. Jeremiah -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/23dba70a-51b2-4986-aabb-dcb865a6a...@jeremiahfoster.com