Sebastian Dröge <sl...@circular-chaos.org> writes: > what's the plan with at-spi2-core/-atk? Will they be uploaded to > experimental soonish (to get them out of NEW) and then to unstable?
I am really not sure right now. > They're part of GNOME 2.30, which is a goal for squeeze, "part of" in the sense that they are installed in paralell with at-spi, or does this mean GNOME 2.30 wants to ship at-spi2 as the default accessibility backend? You have to understand that the switch from at-spi to at-spi2 is very very substantial and likely will break a few things. Additionally, upstream of a lot of GNOME accessibility stuff has just been fired by Oracle, so this switch comes at the worst time possible, with very little upstream support. I am not so happy with changing the accessibility backend beneath our asses a few days before releasing squeeze. Personally, I'd like to see squeeze released with at-spi(1) to ensure a decent user experience, and switch to at-spi2 in squeeze+1 development. However, if anyone can demonstrate at-spi2 stability, I guess a switch is fine as well. But this needs to be tested a lot, by people that *use* the infrastructure so that we can be sure we havent missed anything. -- CYa, ⡍⠁⠗⠊⠕ | Debian Developer <URL:http://debian.org/> .''`. | Get my public key via finger mlang/k...@db.debian.org : :' : | 1024D/7FC1A0854909BCCDBE6C102DDFFC022A6B113E44 `. `' `- <URL:http://delysid.org/> <URL:http://www.staff.tugraz.at/mlang/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/874ojynpwj....@x4.delysid.org
