Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Frank Lin PIAT <fp...@klabs.be>, 2010-04-28, 08:33: >>> * Package name : pyopenfst >>python-openfst ? > > I don't see any reason to deviate from the upstream name. (Python Policy > 2.2 does not apply here, as it doesn't talk about source package names.)
I suppose that the source will be named "pyopenfst", and the binary will be named "python-openfst". That's why I have included "(known upstream as PyOpenFST)" in the description, so people doing "aptitude search pyopenfst" find it. >>I would suggest duplicating libopenfst's description, then add that this >>is python binding, like: [..] > Agreed, thanks for your feedback. Thanks, Franklin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4de39544aa3a4cce49acdad3f456ca08.squir...@www.klabs.be
