On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 13:26 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 09:26:20AM +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 04:22 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > for me it looks as if http://bugs.debian.org/582271 and > > > http://bugs.debian.org/582286 are more or less about packaging the > > > same software. (I'm though not sure so no merge by me, just a heads > > > up. :-) > > > > > > Regards, Axel > > > > They are, thanks for noticing :) > > > > libvpx is the library name for the encoder/decoder, webm is the > > marketing name of the file format. > > > > A package for libvpx is already waiting in NEW. > > Actually, libvpx only deals with the video codec part of webm. The > container part is handled by libnestegg (at least on mozilla end). > > Would some of you be interested in taking care of libnestegg ?
I'm not interested in libnestegg, especially because I don't understand why they have to write yet another Matroska demuxer instead of using one of the existing ones...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
