On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 17:50:32 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

> >* Package name      : libmojolicious-perl
> Any news on above ITP?

The only thing I know:
It's in pkg-perl's svn repository with a note in debian/changelog
about missing work.
(And a newer upstream release is available.)
 
> During my packaging I notice that upstream use "Artistic-2" as
> license, which I believe is not DFSG-free.  

Hu? That's new to me.
And you shouldn't tell it all Artistic-2-only packages in the archive
:)

> I notice Jonathan registered the ITP, but I guess it was on behalf
> of the Perl team.  Would it be ok that I release my packaging as
> official (when the licensing issue is hopefully solved)?

Or you could finish Jonathan's package ...

(I don't care either way, I just suggest to avoid duplicated work as
much as possible.)

> My
> packaging is on behalf of the Perl team, but one possible issue
> could be that I use CDBS which Jonathan might not favor.

In practice this means that hardly anybody will touch the package,
but that's nothing new and not the first package in this situation :)

Cheers,
gregor
 
-- 
 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-    BOFH excuse #296:  The hardware bus needs a new token. 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to