On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 14:43 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 09/29/2010 03:16 PM, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> >> on the long run, i would prefer if v4l2sink could write to the loopback
> >> device as well.
> > 
> > Well, instead of writing something new wouldn't it be better to fix
> > v4lsink instead? :) I'd be happy to review patches and commit them
> > upstream :P
> 
> it turned out that i could fix the v4l2loopback kernel module so that it
> is now supported by v4l2sink.
> 
> since this obsoletes the v4l2loopback gst-element, i guess one could
> close this ITP.
> should i do that?

Yes, please close this ITP. I'll review and commit your patches to
v4l2sink later.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to