On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 08:15:42PM +0800, Liang Guo wrote: > On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Marc-André Lureau > <marcandre.lur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi > > Oh sorry, I don't know I missed you ITP. > > I am looking at the celt issue, we will either have to patch SPICE > > (what I am trying now) or just package celt051, like fedora is doing. > > > Great, if SPICE can be ported to the latest celt, we need not keep two > different version of celt in debian. Ron, the maintainer of celt in > Debian, prefer this methord.
Indeed, since we'll be targeting a debian release that is some 2 years away from the present, it is quite likely that celt will in fact be bitstream frozen by then too (or replaced by a derivative that is). Adjusting to the newer API should be trivial, the main catch is the bitstream compatibility. I don't think we should be looking at packaging celt 0.5 retroactively though, we should be looking ahead. Cheers, Ron -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101102124639.gc1...@audi.shelbyville.oz
