Hello,
> in the ITP bug for libapp-cpanminus-perl it was suggested[1] to name the
> package cpanminus instead. Jonathan suggested that applications from
> the App::* namespace should in general not be named like modules[2].
> I also think it's nicer as cpanminus is not a Perl module, but a (Perl
> related) application. I would like to know what you think about this.
I saw the discussion on debian-perl, but I hadn't much to say about
and then it got submerged by other mails.
About the rename, it's fine to me, I just followed Perl Policy naming
convention and similar packages already in the archive (e.g.
libapp-nopaste-perl) when creating it.
I am not really concerned by the libapp-*-perl naming scheme (IMHO it makes
easier to "map" CPAN names to Debian names) but I see why you would like to
change it.
Btw there is also libapp-perlbrew-perl (in NEW) that should probably be
renamed as well.
Cheers
--
perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{[@_]};and s;\S+;<inidehG ordnasselA>;eg;say~~reverse'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110212151220.GA9770@PC-Ale
