Quoting Rogério Brito (rbr...@ime.usp.br): > No, no. It has seen activity. :-) > > The packages are ready. I am just waiting for a sponsor, after having asked > for reviews (and even posted about fonts that I had packaged for some time > already). Some links that I can cite immediately: > > * > http://rb.doesntexist.org/blog/posts/packaging-fonts-for-a-debian-based-system/ > * https://launchpad.net/~rbrito/+archive/ppa/+packages > * http://git.debian.org/?p=users/rbrito-guest/ttf-anonymous-pro.git > * > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/2010-November/005757.html > * > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/font-anonymous-pro/font-anonymous-pro_1.002-1.dsc > > Yes, I should have updated the bug reports, but I just expected to have them > uploaded (or at least, have feedback) in, say, 15 days after I posted, > instead of half a year. > > If you can sponsor those, I would appreciate. :-)
I probably missed the sponsor request (please note that I don't follow -mentors...I expect RFS requests to show in pkg-fonts-devel....). Still, we finally settled for fontS-<foundry>-<fontname> for the packages' namles. Could you rename that package?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
