Re: http://bugs.debian.org/603157
Thanks to everyone who is taking the issue of the freeness of font packages seriously. bremner's link about building with non-free tools should probably be the thread rooted at: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2010/08/msg00082.html Fonts are a crucial piece of debian's offering. If the preferred form for modification of the font can only be built by non-free tools, it's my understanding that the font would not be acceptable in main; it would only be OK in contrib (or of course non-free, if the license of the font itself does not meet the DFSG, which is a separate issue). Regards, --dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature