On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 06:54:36PM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote: > > > > If they simply change the license now to reflect their true > > > > intentions, then that would be fine. > > > > > > There was a change in the license preamble in the WineX CVS about a week > > > ago. Does it suffice? > > > > Can you post it? > > Sure. (It seems possible that this change is so far only applied to the > winex-2-0 branch, not to the main branch yet, but that's easy to fix) > > Index: LICENSE > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvsroot/winex/wine/LICENSE,v > retrieving revision 1.3 > retrieving revision 1.3.2.1 > diff -u -r1.3 -r1.3.2.1 > --- LICENSE 14 Apr 2002 00:18:21 -0000 1.3 > +++ LICENSE 29 May 2002 02:54:22 -0000 1.3.2.1 > @@ -1,7 +1,15 @@ > Source code and other software components explicitly identified as > Copyright TransGaming Technologies Inc. is covered by the license > below. Other source code and software components are covered by the > -Wine license, found in the LICENSE.winehq file. > +pre-March 1, 2002 Wine license, found in the LICENSE.winehq file. > + > +Note that while this license does permit certain kinds of non-commercial > +distribution of pre-compiled binary packages of WineX, doing so on a large > +scale is discouraged, as it affects TransGaming's ability to continue > +to improve and develop the code. TransGaming reserves the right to > +change the license under which future code is made available, and will > +not hesitate to do so if non-commercial distribution of pre-compiled > +binary packages adversely affects the financing of continued development.
This merely reiterates the point that they have one license for real and one on paper. Not that I give a damn, at least not enough to pursue it... I'm just observing the bandwidth waste done by this thread :> -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]